DeepSeek V4 Pro on AgentX: GB200 vs GB300 Rack-Scale Disaggregation
Both lean on PD disagg, GB300 adds DEP32 wide-EP decode, and the gap shows up in first-token latency rather than token rate
Articles on agentic inference, AgentX results, chip performance, and ML infrastructure.
New to the terminology? Browse the AI inference glossary.
Both lean on PD disagg, GB300 adds DEP32 wide-EP decode, and the gap shows up in first-token latency rather than token rate
DSv4-Pro FP4 8K/1K, Dynamo+vLLM, disaggregated on both racks. GB300's 50% extra HBM (288 vs 192 GB/GPU) unlocks a wider prefill+decode recipe GB200 can't fit — lifting middle-of-curve perf/$ by 2.31x despite a 20% per-GPU TCO premium.
DeepSeek R1 FP4 1k/1k. NVL72's 72-GPU NVLink scale-up fabric lets decode run wide EP up to EP=32, where B200's 8-GPU NVLink island caps out at EP=8 over RoCEv2
Rack scale NVLink on NVL72 lets Dynamo vLLM run Kimi K2.5 wide EP up to Decode EP 16, taking peak throughput from 4,021 to 12,587 tok/s/GPU on 8k/1k NVFP4