MiniMax M3 428B · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M3 428B — B200 vs B300 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B200 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on MiniMax M3 428B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 111 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B, B200 costs $0.26 per million tokens; B300 costs $0.26. B300 is 2% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

B300 edges B200 at 207 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B — $0.64 per million tokens versus $0.68, a 7% cost-per-token gap.

Push MiniMax M3 428B to 304 tok/s/user and B200 lands at $1.90 per million tokens against B300's $1.22 — B300 pulls ahead by 56%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

GPU pricing (owning hyperscaler): B200 $1.95/GPU/hr · B300 $2.34/GPU/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market August 2025 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M3 428B: B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B200 versus B300 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B200:$0.264B300:$0.258
B200:$0.681B300:$0.638
B200:$1.901B300:$1.221
Concurrency
B200:~58B300:~104
B200:~8B300:~11
B200:~1B300:~2

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: