InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,848δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B Β· Chip comparison

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B β€” H100 vs H200

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) and H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Setting 46 tok/s/user as the target on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, H100 produces 4980 tok/s/chip ($0.07 per million tokens) and H200 produces 16937 ($0.02). H200 is 226% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 240% more tok/s/chip.

At 77 tok/s/user interactivity on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B, H100 delivers 4944 tok/s/chip at $0.07 per million tokens; H200 delivers 15499 tok/s/chip at $0.02. H200 is 201% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 213% more tok/s/chip at this point.

H100 posts 4908 tok/s/chip for $0.07 per million tokens at 108 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 176B-A6B; H200 posts 13006 tok/s/chip for $0.03. H200 is 154% cheaper per token; H200 delivers 165% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp8 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H100:4979.7H200:16937.4
H100:4944.2H200:15499.1
H100:4907.6H200:13006.3
Cost ($/M tok)
H100:$0.065H200:$0.020
H100:$0.066H200:$0.022
H100:$0.066H200:$0.026
tok/s/MW
H100:3634841H200:12363057
H100:3608888H200:11313215
H100:3582201H200:9493660
Concurrency
H100:~11H200:~15
H100:~10H200:~13
H100:~9H200:~11

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.