Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · GPU comparison

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — GB300 NVL72 vs MI300X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

GB300 NVL72 posts 6608 tok/s/GPU for $0.11 per million tokens at 43 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B; MI300X posts 346 tok/s/GPU for $0.89. GB300 NVL72 is 701% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 1811% more tok/s/GPU.

Throughput at 53 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: GB300 NVL72 hits 3136 tok/s/GPU, MI300X hits 190. Per-million costs land at $0.24 and $1.63 respectively. GB300 NVL72 is 579% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 1555% more tok/s/GPU.

GB300 NVL72 / MI300X on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B at 62 tok/s/user: 1735 / 123 tok/s/GPU, $0.43 / $2.52 per million tokens. GB300 NVL72 is 479% cheaper per token; GB300 NVL72 delivers 1314% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
GB300 NVL72:6608.5MI300X:345.8
GB300 NVL72:3136.2MI300X:189.5
GB300 NVL72:1735.5MI300X:122.7
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:$0.111MI300X:$0.893
GB300 NVL72:$0.240MI300X:$1.633
GB300 NVL72:$0.434MI300X:$2.517
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:3117197MI300X:248748
GB300 NVL72:1479349MI300X:136357
GB300 NVL72:818627MI300X:88306
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~2063MI300X:~34
GB300 NVL72:~701MI300X:~15
GB300 NVL72:~271MI300X:~8

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: