Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · GPU comparison

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs GB300 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 / GB300 NVL72 on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B at 75 tok/s/user: 2633 / 1084 tok/s/GPU, $0.25 / $0.68 per million tokens. B300 is 176% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 143% more tok/s/GPU.

Around the middle of the 32–206 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 119 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: B300 runs 1313 tok/s/GPU at $0.49/M tokens, GB300 NVL72 runs 447 at $1.65/M. B300 is 238% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 194% more tok/s/GPU.

Setting 163 tok/s/user as the target on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, B300 produces 877 tok/s/GPU ($0.73 per million tokens) and GB300 NVL72 produces 208 ($3.46). B300 is 372% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 322% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
B300:2633.5GB300 NVL72:1083.9
B300:1313.4GB300 NVL72:446.9
B300:877.3GB300 NVL72:207.7
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.246GB300 NVL72:$0.677
B300:$0.487GB300 NVL72:$1.648
B300:$0.733GB300 NVL72:$3.463
tok/s/MW
B300:1386049GB300 NVL72:511290
B300:691245GB300 NVL72:210784
B300:461724GB300 NVL72:97959
Concurrency
B300:~73GB300 NVL72:~63
B300:~23GB300 NVL72:~16
B300:~11GB300 NVL72:~5

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: