MiniMax M3 428B · GPU comparison

MiniMax M3 428B — B300 vs MI325X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on MiniMax M3 428B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

B300 posts 3498 tok/s/GPU for $0.19 per million tokens at 54 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B; MI325X posts 527 tok/s/GPU for $0.68. B300 is 264% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 564% more tok/s/GPU.

Throughput at 97 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B: B300 hits 1358 tok/s/GPU, MI325X hits 203. Per-million costs land at $0.48 and $1.75 respectively. B300 is 264% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 569% more tok/s/GPU.

B300 / MI325X on MiniMax M3 428B at 139 tok/s/user: 1101 / 115 tok/s/GPU, $0.59 / $3.09 per million tokens. B300 is 423% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 860% more tok/s/GPU. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
B300:3498.2MI325X:527.2
B300:1358.2MI325X:203.0
B300:1101.2MI325X:114.8
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.186MI325X:$0.676
B300:$0.481MI325X:$1.750
B300:$0.591MI325X:$3.092
tok/s/MW
B300:1841132MI325X:311959
B300:714833MI325X:120100
B300:579569MI325X:67900
Concurrency
B300:~269MI325X:~43
B300:~42MI325X:~9
B300:~18MI325X:~4

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: