MiniMax M3 428B · Chip comparison

MiniMax M3 428B — B300 vs GB200 NVL72

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on MiniMax M3 428B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX

B300 posts 63812 tok/s/chip for $0.01 per million tokens at 111 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B; GB200 NVL72 posts 26272 tok/s/chip for $0.02. B300 is 100% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 143% more tok/s/chip.

Throughput at 155 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B: B300 hits 37553 tok/s/chip, GB200 NVL72 hits 18724. Per-million costs land at $0.02 and $0.03 respectively. B300 is 65% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 101% more tok/s/chip.

B300 / GB200 NVL72 on MiniMax M3 428B at 199 tok/s/user: 22556 / 7680 tok/s/chip, $0.03 / $0.07 per million tokens. B300 is 142% cheaper per token; B300 delivers 194% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
B300:63812.0GB200 NVL72:26272.1
B300:37552.6GB200 NVL72:18723.7
B300:22555.8GB200 NVL72:7679.8
Cost ($/M tok)
B300:$0.010GB200 NVL72:$0.020
B300:$0.017GB200 NVL72:$0.028
B300:$0.028GB200 NVL72:$0.067
tok/s/MW
B300:33585288GB200 NVL72:14049269
B300:19764548GB200 NVL72:10012691
B300:11871474GB200 NVL72:4106844
Concurrency
B300:~20GB200 NVL72:~18
B300:~22GB200 NVL72:~13
B300:~15GB200 NVL72:~5

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Total Tokens per $1 USD (Owning - Neocloud Giant) vs. Interactivity

MiniMax M3 428B FP4 8K / 1K Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: VR200: 3.61H100: 1.55H200: 1.59B200: 2.07B300: 2.52GB200: 2.26GB300: 2.79MI300X: 1.16MI325X: 1.32MI355X: 2.09RTX6000PRO: 0.75Jalapeño (Teacup): 1.56

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip