Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T · GPU comparison

Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T — GB300 NVL72 vs H200

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and H200 (NVIDIA Hopper) on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

GB300 NVL72: 7910 tok/s/GPU, $0.09 per million tokens at 60 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. H200 is unmeasured here.

At 104 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T, GB300 NVL72 delivers 576 tok/s/GPU at $1.28 per million tokens; H200 hasn't been benchmarked at this target.

GB300 NVL72 hits 194 tok/s/GPU for $3.76 per million tokens at 148 tok/s/user on Kimi K2.5/K2.6/K2.7-Code 1T. No H200 data at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
GB300 NVL72:7910.3H200:
GB300 NVL72:576.5H200:
GB300 NVL72:194.0H200:
Cost ($/M tok)
GB300 NVL72:$0.091H200:
GB300 NVL72:$1.285H200:
GB300 NVL72:$3.759H200:
tok/s/MW
GB300 NVL72:3731285H200:
GB300 NVL72:271928H200:
GB300 NVL72:91527H200:
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~3377H200:
GB300 NVL72:~119H200:
GB300 NVL72:~28H200:

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: