GLM 5/5.1 · GPU comparison

GLM 5/5.1 — GB200 NVL72 vs MI325X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of GB200 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) and MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on GLM 5/5.1. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

GB200 NVL72: 6049 tok/s/GPU, $0.10 per million tokens at 68 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1. MI325X is unmeasured here.

At 98 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1, GB200 NVL72 delivers 1772 tok/s/GPU at $0.35 per million tokens; MI325X hasn't been benchmarked at this target.

GB200 NVL72 hits 963 tok/s/GPU for $0.63 per million tokens at 127 tok/s/user on GLM 5/5.1. No MI325X data at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view →

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/gpu)
GB200 NVL72:6049.3MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:1772.3MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:962.6MI325X:
Cost ($/M tok)
GB200 NVL72:$0.101MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:$0.346MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:$0.635MI325X:
tok/s/MW
GB200 NVL72:3234942MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:947766MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:514742MI325X:
Concurrency
GB200 NVL72:~725MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:~84MI325X:
GB200 NVL72:~49MI325X:

Inference Performance

Inference performance metrics across different models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Vendor:
Aggregation:
Spec Decoding: