InferenceXπŸŽƒbySemiAnalysis logo
HomeAgentXNEWOverviewDashboardubenchXAbout
Star1,848δΈ­ζ–‡
SemiAnalysis logo

Continuous open-source AI accelerator system benchmarking. Real-world, reproducible, auditable performance data trusted by trillion dollar AI infrastructure operators like OpenAI, Meta, Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

SemiAnalysis

Main SiteNewsletterAbout

Legal

Land AcknowledgementPrivacy PolicyCookie Policy

Contribute

BenchmarksAgentX HarnessVisualization

More

SupportersAgentXTelemetryComparisonsArticlesWhitepapersAPI ReferenceHistorical TrendsTCO CalculatorFleet LifecycleFirst-Token LimitsPrefix Cache ReuseChip ReliabilityChip Specs DashboardPerformance per DollarModel ArchitecturesAI Inference GlossaryChip Specs & PricingGPU RankingsModel on GPU Results

If this data helps your work, consider starring us on GitHub or sharing with your network.

Β© 2026 semianalysis.com. All rights reserved.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B Β· Chip comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B β€” H100 vs MI300X

Head-to-head AI inference benchmark comparison of H100 (NVIDIA Hopper) and MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B. Latency, throughput, and cost across LLM workloads. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics β€” same interactions as the main inference chart.

AgentX replays real coding-agent sessions rather than fixed-length prompts, so context grows turn over turn and most of each request is served from cache instead of being recomputed. That turns the comparison into a systems question: KV transfer between nodes, prefix-aware routing, and cache capacity all move the curve alongside raw chip throughput. Fixed-sequence workloads stay the clean baseline for kernel and silicon performance, so the two scenarios answer different questions about the same hardware. Learn more about AgentX β†’

Throughput at 62 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B: H100 hits 12404 tok/s/chip, MI300X hits 9816. Per-million costs land at $0.03 and $0.03 respectively. H100 is 3% cheaper per token; H100 delivers 26% more tok/s/chip.

H100 / MI300X on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B at 110 tok/s/user: 9137 / 5758 tok/s/chip, $0.04 / $0.05 per million tokens. H100 is 29% cheaper per token; H100 delivers 59% more tok/s/chip.

Toward the upper edge of the 15–204 tok/s/user interactivity band, at 157 tok/s/user on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B: H100 runs 6831 tok/s/chip at $0.05/M tokens, MI300X runs 3821 at $0.07/M. H100 is 45% cheaper per token; H100 delivers 79% more tok/s/chip. (Numbers reflect the default agentic-traces Β· fp4 selection for this URL β€” table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

View performance-per-dollar view β†’

Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Throughput (tok/s/chip)
H100:12403.7MI300X:9815.8
H100:9137.4MI300X:5758.3
H100:6830.8MI300X:3821.2
Cost ($/M tok)
H100:$0.026MI300X:$0.027
H100:$0.036MI300X:$0.046
H100:$0.048MI300X:$0.069
tok/s/MW
H100:9053783MI300X:7061698
H100:6669600MI300X:4142675
H100:4985963MI300X:2749084
Concurrency
H100:~19MI300X:~8
H100:~11MI300X:~4
H100:~8MI300X:~1

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Benchmark Config
8K / 1K
Chart Config
Interactivity
Compare history

No data available

No measurements to plot for this selection. Review the benchmark controls above or adjust quick filters.