Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — GB300 NVL72 vs RTX PRO 6000 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus RTX PRO 6000 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

At 56 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, GB300 NVL72 costs $0.02 per million tokens; RTX PRO 6000 costs $0.19. GB300 NVL72 is 1047% more cost-efficient at this operating point.

GB300 NVL72 edges RTX PRO 6000 at 88 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — $0.02 per million tokens versus $0.25, a 1320% cost-per-token gap.

Push Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B to 121 tok/s/user and GB300 NVL72 lands at $0.02 per million tokens against RTX PRO 6000's $0.36 — GB300 NVL72 pulls ahead by 1597%. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB300 NVL72 $2.31/chip/hr · RTX PRO 6000 $0.68/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: GB300 NVL72 versus RTX PRO 6000 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
GB300 NVL72 versus RTX PRO 6000 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
GB300 NVL72:$0.017RTX PRO 6000:$0.194
GB300 NVL72:$0.018RTX PRO 6000:$0.250
GB300 NVL72:$0.021RTX PRO 6000:$0.365
Concurrency
GB300 NVL72:~2983RTX PRO 6000:~10
GB300 NVL72:~1205RTX PRO 6000:~4
GB300 NVL72:~1088RTX PRO 6000:~2

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Cost per Million Total Tokens (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity

Qwen3.5 397B FP4 8K / 1K Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: VR200: 3.61H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68Jalapeño (Teacup): 1.47

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip