Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B · Performance per Dollar

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B — B300 vs RTX PRO 6000 Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of B300 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus RTX PRO 6000 (NVIDIA Blackwell) on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Near the low end of the 28–153 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 59 tok/s/user — B300 runs $0.04 per million tokens on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B while RTX PRO 6000 runs $0.20. B300 is the cheaper choice by 361%.

On Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B at 91 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.06 for B300 and $0.26 for RTX PRO 6000; B300 delivers 355% more output per dollar.

At 122 tok/s/user on Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B, B300 costs $0.07 per million tokens; RTX PRO 6000 costs $0.37. B300 is 416% more cost-efficient at this operating point. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp4 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): B300 $2.26/chip/hr · RTX PRO 6000 $0.68/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B: B300 versus RTX PRO 6000 cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
B300 versus RTX PRO 6000 cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
B300:$0.043RTX PRO 6000:$0.199
B300:$0.057RTX PRO 6000:$0.257
B300:$0.072RTX PRO 6000:$0.369
Concurrency
B300:~60RTX PRO 6000:~9
B300:~30RTX PRO 6000:~4
B300:~18RTX PRO 6000:~2

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Cost per Million Total Tokens (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity

Qwen3.5 397B FP4 8K / 1K Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: VR200: 3.61H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68Jalapeño (Teacup): 1.47

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip