MiniMax M3 428B · Performance per Dollar

MiniMax M3 428B — MI300X vs MI325X Performance per Dollar

Cost per million tokens of MI300X (AMD CDNA 3) versus MI325X (AMD CDNA 3) on MiniMax M3 428B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.

Push MiniMax M3 428B to 48 tok/s/user and MI300X lands at $0.52 per million tokens against MI325X's $0.49 — MI325X pulls ahead by 5%.

MI300X: $1.31 per million tokens. MI325X: $1.19. Both at 82 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B, with MI325X 10% cheaper.

Toward the upper edge of the 15–149 tok/s/user interactivity band — at 115 tok/s/user — MI300X runs $1.85 per million tokens on MiniMax M3 428B while MI325X runs $1.96. MI300X is the cheaper choice by 6%. (Numbers reflect the default 1k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)

Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): MI300X $0.95/chip/hr · MI325X $1.10/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.

View full latency + throughput comparison →

MiniMax M3 428B: MI300X versus MI325X cost per million tokens at matched interactivity levels
MI300X versus MI325X cost per million tokens for this comparison's canonical default workload. Lower cost indicates better performance per dollar.
Interpolated from real benchmark data. Edit target interactivity values below to compare at different operating points.
Metric
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Interactivity (tok/s/user)
Dollar per Million Tokens
MI300X:$0.519MI325X:$0.492
MI300X:$1.313MI325X:$1.191
MI300X:$1.853MI325X:$1.958
Concurrency
MI300X:~45MI325X:~57
MI300X:~10MI325X:~13
MI300X:~5MI325X:~6

Inference Performance

Agentic inference metrics from the AgentX scenario and fixed-sequence inference metrics across models, hardware configurations, and serving parameters.

Cost per Million Total Tokens (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity

MiniMax M3 428B FP4 8K / 1K Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™

TCO $/chip/hr: VR200: 3.61H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68Jalapeño (Teacup): 1.47

Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.

No data available

Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.

Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip