MiniMax M3 428B — GB300 NVL72 vs MI355X Performance per Dollar
Cost per million tokens of GB300 NVL72 (NVIDIA Blackwell) versus MI355X (AMD CDNA 4) on MiniMax M3 428B. Owning-hyperscaler TCO normalized by output tokens — performance per dollar across LLM workloads. Pick the more cost-efficient SKU at every target interactivity level. Use the chart controls below to switch sequences, precisions, and metrics — same interactions as the main inference chart.
On MiniMax M3 428B at 93 tok/s/user, the per-million math comes out to $0.05 for GB300 NVL72 and $0.11 for MI355X; GB300 NVL72 delivers 104% more output per dollar.
At 164 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B, GB300 NVL72 costs $0.24 per million tokens; MI355X costs $0.20. MI355X is 20% more cost-efficient at this operating point.
MI355X edges GB300 NVL72 at 236 tok/s/user on MiniMax M3 428B — $0.34 per million tokens versus $0.37, a 9% cost-per-token gap. (Numbers reflect the default 8k/1k · fp8 selection for this URL — table and chart below update if you change sequence, precision, or model in the controls.)
Chip pricing (owning hyperscaler): GB300 NVL72 $2.31/chip/hr · MI355X $1.50/chip/hr. Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model.
| Metric | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) | Interactivity (tok/s/user) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dollar per Million Tokens | GB300 NVL72:$0.052MI355X:$0.107 | GB300 NVL72:$0.237MI355X:$0.197 | GB300 NVL72:$0.365MI355X:$0.337 |
| Concurrency | GB300 NVL72:~672MI355X:~22 | GB300 NVL72:~20MI355X:~7 | GB300 NVL72:~8MI355X:~3 |
Cost per Million Total Tokens (Owning - Hyperscaler) vs. Interactivity
MiniMax M3 428B • FP4 • 8K / 1K • Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™
MiniMax M3 428B • FP4 • 8K / 1K • Source: SemiAnalysis InferenceX™TCO $/chip/hr: VR200: 3.61H100: 1.17H200: 1.22B200: 1.73B300: 2.26GB200: 1.86GB300: 2.31MI300X: 0.95MI325X: 1.1MI355X: 1.5RTX6000PRO: 0.68Jalapeño (Teacup): 1.47
Source: SemiAnalysis Market July 2026 Pricing Surveys & AI Cloud TCO Model
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate cost per million tokens per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct token cost comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate input throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct input throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate output throughput per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct output throughput comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate power per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct power comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Note: Disaggregated inference configurations (e.g., MoRI SGLang, Dynamo TRTLLM) calculate Joules per decode chip or per prefill chip, rather than per total chip count. This makes direct Joules per token comparison with aggregated configs not an apples-to-apples comparison.
No data available
Please change the model, sequence, precision, date range or chip selection.
Shift+Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Double-click to reset • Click a point to pin tooltip
Interactivity is the rate at which a single user receives generated tokens while the model streams its answer — how quickly new words appear on screen. Higher values feel snappier; operators trade it against batch throughput.
Estimated infrastructure cost of producing one million total tokens (input + output) at this operating point, priced with the all-in hourly ownership cost of a hyperscaler operator. Lower is cheaper.
Formula: $/Mtok = all-in cost per chip-hour ($) × 1,000,000 ÷ (3,600 × total tok/s/chip)
1 The ATOM engine is promising, however it has yet to serve production tokens. It is still in its infant stage.